Nigeria and ‘unremitted’ revenues

By Editor, Guardian on 28/02/2014

Share on facebook Yahoo mail icon Gmail icon

Views: 4723

THE Federal Ministry of Finance earns full blame for dereliction of responsibility by condoning, over the years, opaque handling and retention by the national oil company, Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), of significant amounts of oil proceeds that ordinarily should have been audited regularly and remitted to the Federation Account (FA). Explanations that the unremitted funds were intact and within the system merely confirm wilful abandonment of the ministry’s statutory duty of ensuring full collection and remittance of government revenues as and when due to enable FA beneficiaries to plan and implement their budgets without borrowing or, if need be, by incurring minimal deficit as a means of providing the requisite foundation for a sound and productive economy. That foundation has, sadly, remained elusive.  

    There are at least two areas to rummage for unremitted oil revenues. To begin with, a little analysis of the Central Bank data on liftings on crude oil by NNPC since January 2012 shows that the amount of $12 billion that could not be readily reconciled by the relevant agencies tallies with the value of approximately 47 per cent of domestic crude allocation (DCA) of 445,000 barrels of crude oil per day over the period that was swapped or refined offshore. Because the combined value of non-petrol derivatives of crude oil that was refined offshore exceeds that of the petrol portion that was imported, the NNPC nets some profit on swapped crude oil which, after reconciliation, should be remitted in dollars to the FA.

    NNPC locally refines the balance of about 53 per cent of the DCA. Apart from petrol, refined petroleum products including kerosene (in practice) are deregulated. NNPC, therefore, enjoys full cost recovery and even makes some savings or profit on locally processed DCA, too. Consequently, the naira value of the entire petrol obtained from the DCA (using the world price of crude oil) should be remitted to the FA. This sum exceeds by far the Sure-P subsidy savings, which should be subsequently stopped. The foregoing shows that in addition to swelling the FA, “if NNPC properly manages the allocation of 445,000 barrels per day effectively, the availability of (various refined) products can be achieved by the NNPC alone”, as the House Ad-hoc Committee on Fuel Subsidy concluded in April 2012.

    Twenty months on, the NNPC has stuck to its operations which are not only steeped in corruption but also withholds oil receipts from the FA thereby undermining the economy, which to all intents and purposes is an act of economic sabotage. The Ministry of Petroleum Resources exulted in self-defence at the recent reconciliation exercise that the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) had long been aware of a shortfall in FA oil accrual. That display of unconcern underscores the official unwillingness to do things right. The allegations of unremitted oil revenues, whatever figure, remain a stigma that must be cleared with thorough investigation.

   In the circumstance, there is need to ascertain publicly the size of the naira and dollar proceeds arising from NNPC’s less than-transparent handling of the DCA for as far back as the statute of limitations permits. Any outstanding proceeds should be remitted to the Federation Account without delay. In order to reduce the endemic corruption in the national oil company’s operations and help improve the economy, several other measures should be adopted urgently. In the first place, the domestic crude allocation should stop. Like refineries elsewhere, government or privately owned petroleum refineries in the country should purchase their crude oil in the open market at the going world price.

   Second, to ensure optimal performance, the NNPC refineries should be privatised as planned. Third, all volumes of crude oil and gas produced and sold by various oil operators should be published daily and by ownership for public consumption and ease of monitoring by relevant agencies and interest groups. This step will shed light on, for example, the huge differences between crude oil import data into the U.S. from Nigeria as published by the U.S. government and released NNPC crude oil export figures to that country. Nigerians in their own right should have access to such information and they should, therefore, demand it. Fourth, the National Assembly should enact the long-delayed Petroleum Industry Act to help enthrone transparency in the petroleum sector. The Act should proactively reflect the envisaged true federal structure of the country, reassign and redefine the responsibilities of the various public institution of the petroleum sector accordingly.

   The other area where, in the final analysis, the Finance Ministry half-heartedly attempts to get collected oil revenues corruptly withheld from the FA by various petroleum sector operators relate to the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI). Last year’s end, the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), inaugurated an expanded Inter-Ministerial Task Team (IMTT) of high-ranking officials. The team was charged with the responsibility of recovering all unremitted revenues that NEITI audit reports (they began to be issued in 2006) have unearthed. Regrettably, that move is a classic case of passing the buck despite Goodluck Jonathan administration’s hypocritical conviction “that once transparency is implanted in the management of the nation’s abundant extractive resources, it will boost the government’s efforts towards poverty reduction, sustainable development, social harmony as well as better investment climate.” Yet, the early NEITI reports already risk being overtaken by the statute of limitations. The truth is that NEITI audit findings and recommendations that are not counted by reports of the Auditor-General of the Federation do not require the imprimatur of further time-buying bureaucratic contraption that is again headed by the NEITI chairman before the President or the SGF, upon receipt of statutorily mandatory FMF requisition, issues appropriate directive to put the audit decisions into effect. All outstanding NEITI findings, therefore, only need to be implemented complete with associated sanctions against any defaulting firms and individuals. That would be the beginning of value for money or value for blessings for Nigerians in their oil industry.


Posted on March, 1 2014

Share on facebook Yahoo mail icon Gmail icon

You may also like...

Nigeria and the Ghosts of 1966


Buhari’s burdens are too much for Nigeria By...

Reno Omokri; The accidental Media aide

OPINION: Biafra Unity is Supreme and the only...

May Day, Tiwa Savage, Her Husband And Nigeria...

Osinbajo and the Quagmire of Power struggle

How not to demarket Abia


Dr Orji Uzor Kalu,APC and South East...The dilemma...

An Open Letter Nnamdi Kanu MUST Read, NOT...
Opinions Editorial (4) Letters (11) Perspectives (321)





Latest Opinions ABIA:THREE YEARS AFTER UNDER GOV. IKPEAZU (pt2) 18th Democracy Day: How has Nigeria faired? Multi-Party Democracy: Osibanjo, Ikpeazu As Role Models Item day in aba, my indescribable joy and a heart full of thanks THE REAL PRICE OF “CHANGING THE CHANGE” (1) Ikpeazu: We can't go back to Babylon Buhari's Confusing And Dangerous Rhetoric On Herdsmen Ikpeazu: Innovating to serve Abians Xenophobic Attacks: Nigerians have shown more love #OPINION: ABIA OPPOSITION CAN ONLY RUN ON LIES AND PROPAGANDA


Most Read Kebbi 2015: Dakingari’s legacy and friendly enemies within (5,274 views) Nigeria and ‘unremitted’ revenues (4,723 views) APUGO’s STOOGE MENTALITY (4,665 views) FG predicates Sanusi’s suspension on loss of confidence in his ability to lead CBN (4,631 views) Understanding Kalu’s Anger (1) (4,481 views) Discourse on Our “Mumu”, Part 3 (4,343 views) It Is All Lies, Muhammadu Buhari Never Built Any Refinery (4,125 views) Before We Crucify Jonathan…. (3,889 views) Discourse on Our “Mumu”, Part 1 (3,717 views) ABIA’S NEW APPROACH TO GOVERNANCE (3,675 views)